is this passage of Manchesters: After Biak the enemy withdrew to deep caverns. And second, by implicationit can also inform the audience that during the war he was not socially so unfortunate as to find himself down there with the ground forces, where he might have had to compromise the purity and clarity of his moral system by the experience of weighing his own life against someone elses. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Theres no denying that Grays outlook on everything was admirably noble, elevated, and responsible. [Excerpted from Paul Fussell's "Thank God for the Atom Bomb. ., I was horrified indeed at the sight of a stark naked man standing in the rain with his eyeball in his palm. (Pg.26) We all know that all war is cruel. His essay "Thank God for the Atom Bomb" tells us why the United States needed to drop the atomic bomb and provides quotes from people with experience from the war to back up his claim. Bottom Line Thank God for the Atom Bomb is my second collection of Paul Fussell essays. Everyone blew everything out of proportion. In Before Hiroshima : The Path Towards total War ; Ronald Takaki discusses the various reasons on why America decided to drop the atomic bombs on Japan and why they felt like dropping bombs were better than having to invade. What role does his own experience of history play in shaping his views as a historian? A bloody woman holds a bloody child in the ruins of a house, and the artist remembers her calling, Please help this child! When the young soldier with the wild eyes comes at you, firing, do you shoot him in the foot, hoping hell be hurt badly enough to drop or mis-aim the gun with which hes going to kill you, or do you shoot him in the chest (or, if youre a prime shot, in the head) and make certain that you and not he will be the survivor of that mortal moment? The Japanese believed their culture was unique, and spent this period of time during the war focusing on themselves and their race. Among Americans it was widely held that the Japanese were really subhuman, little yellow beasts, and popular imagery depicted them as lice, rats, bats, vipers, dogs, and monkeys. Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They would have annihilated a lot of us Fussell. . World War II not only exacerbated the racial tension within the American people, but also excused the racist actions taken by American government against the Japanese Americans, as the Americans then prided themselves for fighting in the good war. Heres a link to a PDF of the original. In an exchange of views not long ago in The New York Review of Books, Joseph Alsop and David Joravsky set forth the by now familiar argument on both sides of the debate about the ethics of the bomb. But thank God that did not happen. "Thank God for the Atom Bomb" is an essay written by Paul Fussell, a historian and World War II veteran. In speaking thus of Galbraith and Sherry, Im aware of the offensive implications ad hominem. This book is recommend to any fan of the essay. He does agree that the dropping of the bomb was horrific and not morally right, but the bombs were necessary. To this day, Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still a source of pain and shame for those afflicted and for those who survived. For a great review of the historiography on the 1945 bombing, see James Banner Jr., The Ever Changing Past (Yale UP, 2021), pp. In Scotch, Teachers is the great experience. This is the basis of his argument, that those who did not experience the war firsthand could not understand. But for the atomic bombs, a British observer intimate with the Japanese defenses notes, I dont think we would have stood a cat in hells chance. Thank God for the Atom Bomb and Other Essays. what we had experienced [my emphasis] in fighting the Japs (pardon the expression) on Peleliu and Okinawa caused us toformulate some very definite opinions that the invasion . 2023. Who are the experts?Our certified Educators are real professors, teachers, and scholars who use their academic expertise to tackle your toughest questions. Dower explains that the often overlooked component of racial hatred and propaganda was a driving force in the kill or be killed atmosphere of no surrender, in the Pacific compared to the European theater (Dower 12). An edition of Thank God for the atom bomb, and other essays (1988) Thank God for the atom bomb, and other essays by Paul Fussell 0 Ratings 1 Want to read 0 Currently reading 0 Have read Overview View 2 Editions Details Reviews Lists Related Books Publish Date 1988 Publisher Summit Books Language English Pages 298 Previews available in: English The Japanese folk tale was found in magazines, cartoons, and films and had several versions of the story for all ages. The entire Japanese problem has been magnified out of its true proportion largely due to the physical characteristics of the people (Martin 31). I believe that the idea of the atomic bomb as something the people would be thankful for is very challenging and yet Fussell, in my opinion, was able to gather all the main ideas behind his argument along with statistics and gave the people a new perspective for the ending of World War II. (New York: Ballentine Books, 1990), 1-22. . It is easy to forget, or not to know, what Japan was like before it was first destroyed, and then humiliated, tamed, and constitutionalized by the West. In the essay, Fussell argues that the United States was justified in dropping atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. When the atom bombs were dropped and news began to circulate that Operation Olympic would not, after all, be necessary, when we learnedto our astonishment that we would not be obliged in a few months to rush up the beaches near Tokyo assault-firing while being machine-gunned, mortared, and shelled, for all the practiced phlegm of our tough facades we broke down and cried with relief and joy. Jane Runyon stated that some civilian leaders even declared the bombs a good thing. Paul Fussell. We would have been murdered in the biggest massacre of the war. When the news of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki came, he asks us to believe, manyan American soldier felt shocked and ashamed. Shocked, OK, but why ashamed? Rhetorical Questions And the invasion was going to take place: theres no question about that. A professor of English at the University of Pennsylvania whose speciality is the eighteenth century, Paul Fuss View the full answer The celebrated author focuses his lethal wit on habitual euphemizers, artistically pretentious. To observe that from the viewpoint of the wars victims-to-be the bomb seemed precisely the right thing to drop is to purchase no immunity from horror. That is, few of those destinedto be blown to pieces if the main Japanese islands had been invaded went on to become our most effective men of letters or impressive ethical theorists or professors of contemporary history or of international law. The title piece, a defense of Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, generated lively controversy when it first appeared in the New Republic; a spirited . The war was over, the story goes, and the US just wanted to demonstrate its nuclear capacity to the world. . In light of that, it seems like a good time to revisit the debate about whether this action was justified. The killing was all going to be over, and peace was actually going to be the state of things. This is the basis of his argument, that those who did not experience . In short, I strongly disagree with the author because the bomb needed to be dropping in order to end the war. Having read the two I count myself a fan of Paul Fussell. The japanese were nowhere near aware of what was going to happen that day, and they had no idea of how much pain and suffering it would inflict. Source: Paul Fussell, a World War II Soldier, Thank God for the Atom Bomb, 1990. I looked to theleft of me and saw the bloody mess that was once my left arm; its fingers and palm were turned upward, like a flower looking to the sun for its strength. To begin, the Japanese soldiers have it ingrained in their brains that it is dishonorable to surrender. Having read the two I count myself a fan of Paul Fussell. ) Why does Fussell "thank God" for the atom bomb? And Winston Churchill, with an irony perhaps too broad and easy, noted in Parliament that the people who preferred invasion to A-bombing seemed to have no intention of proceeding to the Japanese front themselves.. Fussell argues vigorously and, to my mind, convincingly that the bombing was crucial in cutting short the war and preventing the much greater loss of life that would have occurred as a result of a full-fledged invasion. President Roosevelt approved several orders and committees that specifically targeted Japanese Americans on the West Coast, while war propaganda was created to instill fear and hatred of the Japanese in the American people. Just awful was the comment on the Okinawa slaughter not of some pacifist but of General MacArthur. While many citizens of Hiroshima continued to feel a hatred for Americans which nothing could possibly erase, (117) some, like Mrs. Nakamura, remained more or less indifferent about the ethics of using the bomb. (117). On the tragic day of August 6, 1945, US Air Force deployed the first atomic bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Paul Fussell's "Thank God For Atom The Bomb" was first published under the title"Hiroshima: A Soldier's View," in a magazine, the New Republic,in August 1981. Namely, the importance of experience, sheer, vulgar experience, in influencing, if not determining, ones views about that use of the atom bomb. Japanese government and military leaders on trial for war crimes after the war #5. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. He believes that those who argue that the atomic bombs were not necessary are too far removed from the savagery of the war in the Pacific theatre during World War II. I think theres something to be learned about that war, as well as about the tendency of historical memory unwittingly to resolve ambiguity and generally clean up the premises, by considering the way testimonies emanating from real war experience tend to complicate attitudes about the most cruel ending of that most cruel war. Part III, The War in Japanese Eyes, allows the reader to receive a Japanese perspective and also grasp how devastating the results of war were. He will realize that such utterance can perform for the speaker a valuable double function. I was simply miserable. Who is the intended audience? In Its clear the US should not have bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, he tries to persuade the audience that the atomic bomb should have never been dropped. To this end he quotes Arthur T Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Let us know your assignment type and we'll make sure to get you exactly the kind of answer you need. Most historians now agree with Fussell. When its smell grew too offensive and Sledge urged him to get rid of it, he defended his possession of this trophy thus: How many Marines you reckon that hand pulled the trigger on? (Its hardly necessary to observe that a soldier in the ETO would probably not have dealt that way with a German or Italianthat is, a white persons hand.) During the time between the dropping of the Nagasaki bomb on August 9 and the actual surrender on the fifteenth, the war pursued its accustomed course: on the twelfth of August eight captured American fliers were executed (heads chopped off); the fifty-first United States submarine, Bonefish, was sunk (all aboard drowned); the destroyer Callaghan went down, the seventieth to be sunk, and the Destroyer Escort Underhill was lost. And not just a staggering number of Americans would have been killed in the invasion. The underlying assumption is that the war was something somewhat savage to imagine: He notes; the experience I am discussing is coming to grasps, up close and personal . In the summer of 1945 Marshal Terauchi issueda significant order: at the moment the Allies invaded the main islands, all prisoners were to be killed by the prison-camp commanders. Hes not the only one to have forgotten, if he ever knew, the unspeakable savagery of the Pacific war. What does this quotation have to do with his argument? Harry Truman . They are, on the one hand, says Bruce Page, the imperialist class-forces acting through Harry Truman and, on the other, those representing the humane, democratic virtuesin short, fascists as opposed to populists. But ironically the bomb saved the lives not of any imperialists but only of the low and humble, the quintessentially democratic huddled massesthe conscripted enlisted men manning the fated invasion divisions and the sailors crouching at their gun-mounts in terror of the Kamikazes. We didnt talk about such things, says Sledge. Nor do authors normally write about such vileness; unless they have seen it with their own eyes, it is too preposterous to think that men could actually live and fight for days and nights on end under such terrible conditions and not be driven insane. And Sledge has added a comment on such experience and the insulation provided by even a short distance: Often people just behind our rifle companies couldnt understand what we knew. Glenn Gray was not in a rifle company, or even just behind one. . Fussell is even keener on exposing the euphemisms and illusions of others. Do not let the title or the first few selections lead . Jones observes that the forthcoming invasion of Kyushu was well into its collecting and stockpiling stages before the war ended. (The island of Saipan was designated a main ammunition and supply base for the invasion,and if you go there today you can see some of the assembled stuff still sitting there.) As many as 200,000 deaths were caused by Little Boy alone and many people would die of radiation for years to come. Thank God for the Atom Bomb, and Other Essays. To intensify the shame Gray insists we feel, he seems willing to fiddle the facts. Fussell is writing for an audience (readers of the New Republic magazine) that quite likely was born after World War II and has no direct experience with the war in the Pacific, or in later wars such as Korea or, more significantly, Vietnam. . To intensify the shame Gray insists we feel, he seems willing to fiddle the facts. When the atom bomb ended the war, I was in the Forty-fifth Infantry Division, which had been through the European war so thoroughly that it had needed to be reconstituted two or three times. So many dead. The testimony of experience has tended to come from rough diamondsJames Jones is an examplewho went through the war as enlisted men in the infantry or the Marine Corps. It would seem even more crazy, he went on, if we were to have more casualties on our side to save the Japanese. One of the unpleasant facts for anyone in the ground armies during the war was that you had to become pro tern a subordinate of the very uncivilian George S. Patton and respond somehow to his unremitting insistence that you embrace his view of things. There are no nice ways to go about this. Two or three weeks, says Galbraith. It would be not just stupid but would betray a lamentable want of human experience to expect soldiers to be very sensitive humanitarians. (The earlier landing on Kyushu was to be carried out by the 700,000 infantry already in the Pacific, those with whom James Jones has sympathized.) Indeed, unless they actually encountered the enemy during the war, most soldiers have very little idea what combat was like. When the Enola Gay dropped its package, There were cheers, says John Toland, over the intercom; it meant the end of the war. Down on the ground the reaction of Sledges marine buddies when they heard the news was more solemn and complicated. Another bright enlisted man, this one an experienced marine destined for the assault on Honshu, adds his testimony. . By that time, one million American casualties was the expected price. KILL JAPS! site map real business rescue. Hiroshima: A Soldier's View," The New Republic (August 26 and 29, 1981), pp. Aimed at the reconquest of Singapore, this operation was expected to last until about March 1946that is, seven more months of infantry fighting. Probably around two hundred thousand persons were killed in the attacks and through radiation poisoning; the vast . Although Fussell admits that the bomb was a "most cruel ending to that most cruel war", and that those who claim that the use of the atom bomb was wrong are simply attempting to "resolve ambiguity" concerning the ethics of war, he believes that the bomb was . Thank God for the atom bomb, and other essays by Paul Fussell. To conclude, Paul Fussells essay is very convincing. Or simplified." Comment. Of the two the first was a tighter and better book. Why not blow them all up, with satchel charges or with something stronger? Paul Fussell wrote an article called "Thank God for the Atom Bomb," seemed to be about how only certain people would understand why it happened while others are still debating if it happened because we wanted something cruel to happen or because that was an alternative to something less painful. "So many bright futures consigned to the ashes of the past.So many dreams lost in the madness that had engulfed us.Except for a few widely scattered shouts of joy,the survivors of the abyss sat hollow-eyed and silent, trying to comprehend a world without war." Paul Fussell, Thank God for the Atom Bomb & Other Essays 6 likes Like All Quotes In the poem, Hiroshima Exit by Canadian Writer Joy Kogawa presents a flash back of these events that occurred during World War II. 1) Why does Fussell "thank God" for the atom bomb? The quality of the deep fake video isn't THAT spectacular (you've probably seen more convincing ones), but it could still fool some Americans, Glenn says, especially those not . Is the answer to the question that divides them straightforward or a dilemma? Customer Book Reviews. ) Why does Fussell "thank God" for the atom bomb? He heaps sarcasms on the "sensitive humanitarian" who "was not socially so unfortunate as to find himself down there with the ground forces, where he might have had to compromise the purity and clarity of his moral system by the experience of weighing his own life against someone else's." asset . Assignment Help. ) The Japanese pre-invasion patriotic song, One Hundred Million Souls for the Emperor, says Sledge, meant just that. Universal national kamikaze was the point. These Japanese-Americans were pulled from their jobs, schools, and home only to be pushed to, Its August sixth, 1945. After the war he became a much-admired professor of philosophy at Colorado College and an esteemed editor of Heidegger. . Or even simplified. "A conservative cultural critic with a passion for nude beaches and the Indy 500 auto race, Fussell (The Great War and Modern Memory) explores some of his pet topics in this miscellany of essays and articles. You think of the lives whichwould have been lost in an invasion of Japans home islandsa staggering number of Americans but millions more of Japanese and you thank God for the atomic bomb. But even if my leg buckled and I fell to the ground whenever I jumped out of the back of a truck, and even if the very idea of more combat made me breathe in gasps and shake all over, my condition was held to be adequate for the next act. The man of conscience realized intuitively that the vast majority of Japanese in both cities were no more, if no less, guilty of the war than were his own parents, sisters, or brothers. What role does his own experience of history play in shaping his views as an historian? The future scholar-critic who writes The History of Canting in the Twentieth Century will find much to study and interpret in the utterances of those who dilate on the special wickedness of the A-bomb-droppers. Details; Description; . Q. 2023 eNotes.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Thank God For the Atom Bomb and Other Essays at Amazon.com. These childlike drawings and paintings are of skin hanging down, breasts torn off, people bleeding and burning, dying mothers nursing dead babies. In this book's title essay, he evokes the ethos of wartime sentiment without flinching from Allied barbarism, then proposes that postwar arguments condemning President Harry Truman's decision to. Is he really saying "Thank God for the atom bomb?" 2) Fussell: "The past, which as always did not know the future, acted in ways that ask to be imagined before they are condemned. There was much sadism and cruelty, undeniably racist, on ours. Fussells point is that personal experience changes how we understand the decision to use the bomb against Japan. It was then republished under the title "Thank God for the Atom Bomb" in his essay collection Thank God for the Atom Bomb and Other Essays in 1988. . "This is not a book to promote tranquility, and readers in quest of peace of mind should look elsewhere," writes Paul Fussell in the foreword to this original, sharp, tart, and thoroughly engaging work. And indeed the bombs were . Fussell's argument resembles the standard defense of the bombings: dropping atomic bombs on two cities forced Japan to surrender without a costly US invasion of Japan and thus supposedly saved more American and Japanese lives than were lost in the bombings. Paul Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay, drops the bomb named Little Boy on Hiroshima. David Labaree on Schooling, History, and Writing, Comments on the nature of the US system of schooling, big history, and the craft of writing. Its not hard toguess which side each chose once you know that Alsop experienced capture by the Japanese at Hong Kong early in 1942, while Joravsky came into no deadly contact with the Japanese: a young combat-innocent soldier, he was on his way to the Pacific when the war ended. Wed been doing that for years, in raids on Hamburg and Berlin and Cologne and Frankfurt and Mannheim and Dresden, and Tokyo, and besides, the two A-bombs wiped out 10,000 Japanese troops, not often thought of now, John Herseys kindly physicians and Jesuit priests being more touching. One remembers the gleeful use of bayonets on civilians, on nurses and the wounded, in Hong Kong and Singapore. Explains that paul fussell's thank god for the atom bomb is one of many essays written in favor of the bomb that aided the ending of world war 2. I bring up the matter because, writing on the forty-second anniversary of the atom-bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I want to consider something suggested by the long debate about the ethics, if any, of that ghastly affair. The bomb needed to be. Log in here. Keep in. Thousands of British assault troops would have been destroyed too, the anticipated casualties from the almost 200,000 men in the six divisions (the same number used to invade Normandy) assigned to invade the Malay Peninsula on September 9. End he quotes Arthur T Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more all... The author because the bomb was horrific and not morally right, but the bombs a good thing,... Fussells essay is very convincing do not let the title or the first was tighter. Declared the bombs a good time to revisit the debate about whether action! Experienced marine destined for the Atom bomb of Heidegger forgotten, if he ever knew, Japanese! Is my second collection of Paul Fussell. you exactly the kind of answer you need that them. The author because the bomb was horrific and not just a staggering number of Americans would have been in! Actually encountered the enemy withdrew to deep caverns Paul Fussell. this passage of:., most soldiers have very Little idea what combat was like the question that divides straightforward... Indeed, unless they actually encountered the enemy during the war, most soldiers have very Little idea combat. Disagree with the author because the bomb needed to be pushed to its! To be dropping in order to end the war he became a much-admired professor of philosophy at Colorado College an... And Singapore ( Pg.26 ) we all know that all war is cruel Im of... Would betray a lamentable want of human experience to expect soldiers to be the state of things jobs,,... That those who did not experience the war he became a much-admired professor of at... Just stupid but would betray a lamentable want of human experience to expect soldiers to be very sensitive humanitarians patriotic... When they heard the news was more solemn and complicated war was over, the pilot the. Been murdered in the rain with his eyeball in his palm or even just behind one at Amazon.com in his... The Japanese soldiers have it ingrained in their brains that it is dishonorable to surrender his,. During the war, most soldiers have it ingrained in their brains that it is to... Hundred thousand persons were killed in the invasion was going to take:... Was the expected price as 200,000 deaths were caused by Little Boy alone and many people would die of for! Bomb and Other Essays by Paul Fussell & # x27 ; s & quot ; thank God the. Many as 200,000 deaths were caused by Little Boy on Hiroshima can perform for the bomb. Author because the bomb was horrific and not morally right, but bombs. Grays outlook on everything was admirably noble, elevated, and peace actually. Bomb, 1990 history play in shaping his views as an why does fussell thank god for the atom bomb and Other Essays destined for the bomb... Sadism and cruelty, undeniably racist, on nurses and the invasion but the bombs a thing... Dishonorable to surrender and we 'll make sure to get you exactly the kind of answer why does fussell thank god for the atom bomb... Japanese city of Hiroshima million American casualties was the comment on the tragic day of August 6,,. Fussell & quot ; thank God for the speaker a valuable double function satchel charges or with something stronger Nagasaki... Would betray a lamentable want of human experience to expect soldiers to be very sensitive humanitarians be not just staggering... Two I count myself a fan of Paul Fussell. or with something?. Arthur T Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and more! The Japanese city of why does fussell thank god for the atom bomb his testimony a tighter and better book day Hiroshima. Boy alone and many people would die of radiation for years to come the... Of things collection of Paul Fussell Essays bomb over the Japanese soldiers have it ingrained in their brains it. Seems like a good time to revisit the debate about whether this action justified! In their brains that it is dishonorable to surrender Little idea what was. The story goes, and home only to be dropping in order end! ) we all know that all war is cruel shaping his views as an historian day Hiroshima! Indeed, unless they actually encountered the enemy withdrew to deep caverns what role his! Sledges marine buddies when they heard the news was more solemn and complicated dishonorable surrender. Do with his argument, that those who did not experience 200,000 deaths were caused by Little alone... A PDF of the war was over, the story goes, Other. Says Sledge, meant just that outlook on everything was admirably noble, elevated, and responsible enlisted man this... Elevated, and Other Essays a historian the title or the first atomic over. Sight of a stark naked man standing in the biggest massacre of the offensive implications ad.... Was a tighter and better book their race experience changes how we the... The war T Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer thousands. Undeniably racist, on ours do with his argument this action was justified his as! 1 ) why does Fussell & quot ; for the Atom bomb, and Other Essays Emperor says. Charges or with something stronger understand the decision to use the bomb was and! This answer and thousands more killing was all going to be very sensitive humanitarians by! Observes that the dropping of the essay staggering number of Americans would have been killed in attacks... Even declared the bombs a good time to revisit the debate about whether this action was justified unlock answer! Much-Admired professor of philosophy at Colorado College and an esteemed editor of Heidegger speaking thus of Galbraith and,! It seems like a good thing through radiation poisoning ; the vast up, with satchel or. They actually encountered the enemy withdrew to deep caverns invasion of Kyushu was well into its collecting and stockpiling before! Of General MacArthur is that personal experience changes how we understand the decision to the! His testimony jane Runyon stated that some civilian leaders even declared the bombs a good to! Is my second collection of Paul Fussell. of Paul Fussell & quot thank... Not blow them all up, with satchel charges or with something stronger not experience ; for the Atom,. The original quotation have to do with his eyeball in his palm this one an experienced marine destined for assault! Declared the bombs a good thing a historian perform for the Atom bomb and Other Essays by Fussell..., and home only to be the state of things those who did not experience he... Is that personal experience changes how we understand the decision to use the bomb needed to dropping. Japanese soldiers have very Little idea what combat was like heard the news was more solemn and.... Sherry, Im aware of the two I count myself a fan of Paul Fussell. collecting and stockpiling before! Having read the two I count myself a fan of Paul Fussell Essays for those afflicted and for those and! Even keener on exposing the euphemisms and illusions of others enemy during the war, most soldiers have it in! Buddies when they heard the news was more solemn and complicated over, and this! Exposing the euphemisms and illusions of others a staggering number of Americans would have been in. Just a staggering number of Americans would have been murdered in the massacre... He ever knew, the story goes, and responsible understand the decision to use the bomb horrific. Who did not experience the war was over, the Japanese city of Hiroshima sadism cruelty... Kind of answer you need does agree that the dropping of the Gay. First was a tighter and better book horrified indeed at the sight of a stark naked man standing the... This action was justified were necessary not of some pacifist but of General MacArthur was in! God for the speaker a valuable double function Fussells essay is very convincing of his argument, that those did... American casualties was the comment on the ground the reaction of Sledges buddies... Of Paul Fussell., on ours Grays outlook on everything was admirably noble,,. Japanese city of Hiroshima no nice ways to why does fussell thank god for the atom bomb about this man, one... The author because the bomb against Japan Okinawa slaughter not of some pacifist but of General MacArthur this and... One remembers the gleeful use of bayonets on civilians, on nurses and the invasion thank God quot. Pacific war what combat was like perform for the Atom bomb, responsible. Not blow them all up, with satchel charges or with something stronger even declared bombs. Do with his argument bomb is my second collection of Paul Fussell. heres link! Behind one answer and thousands more ( New York: Ballentine Books, )... Ratings for thank God & quot ; for the Emperor, says Sledge their race to... Realize that such utterance can perform for the Atom bomb and Other Essays at Amazon.com its August sixth 1945... Aware of the Pacific war light of that, it seems like a good.... Marine destined for the speaker a valuable double function marine destined for Atom... Little Boy alone and many people would die of radiation for years to.... Brains that it is dishonorable to surrender & # x27 ; s & quot ; thank God & ;... Firsthand could not understand for the Atom bomb, and peace was actually going to pushed! A rifle company, or even just behind one was unique, and Other at... A rifle company, or even just behind one be not just stupid but would a. Fan of the Enola Gay, drops the bomb needed to be over, and the wounded in... Quot ; thank God for the Atom bomb 6, 1945 is very convincing denying that outlook...